Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 14 - Jul 19
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1979-1992 Mustang Pro+ Brake System Rear 4262291MGFits 1979 92 Ford Mustang w OE Ford 8. 8" C clip Rear End (4 Lug) Features: 2 Piece, 6 Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs: Applications Ford Mustang 79 92
Fits 1979-92 Ford Mustang w/OE Ford 8.8" C-clip Rear End (4 Lug)
Features:
- 2-Piece, 6-Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
- CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum
- Powder Coated Finish
- Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
- Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
- Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
- 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat
Specs:
| Applications | Ford Mustang 79-92 |
|---|---|
| Axle | Rear |
| Axle Standoff | 2.50IN |
| Brand | Baer Brakes |
| Caliper | 6P |
| Caliper Color | Monster Green |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Piston Quantity | 6 |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Type | Floating |
| Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number | D0731 |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Construction | Vented |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Outside Diameter | 14.000IN |
| Emission Code | 6 |
| Export Description | Brake Components |
| Fitment Notes | w/OE Ford 8.8 C-clip Rear End (4 Lug) |
| Grade Type | Performance |
| Hose Material | Stainless Steel |
| Includes Park Brake | Yes |
| Includes Park Brake Cables | Yes |
| Lug Count | 4 Lug |
| Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) | 18IN |
| Product Line | 14 Inch Pro+ |
| Product Type | 14 Inch Pro+ Rear Brake Kit |
| Prop 65 (C, R or CR) | CR |
| Prop 65 - Long Label | WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 - Short Label | WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm. www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 Yes/No | Yes |
| Rotor Thickness | 1.150IN |
| Rotor Type | 2-Piece |
| Surface Type | Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated |
| System Notes | Fits 79-92 Mustang (Fox) with OE 8.8" c-clip rear end & 4 lug axles (Master cylinder upgrade is recommended, see Note below) |
| Template | Q085P |
| Title | Pro+ Brake System Rear |
| Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern | 4x4.25 |
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1979-1992 | Ford | Mustang |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 794 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great Quality
Size: 34, Color: #01black
Shorts I ordered were great. Good quality and perfect fit. Exact color I ordered. Won’t hesitate in ordering more in the future
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Online vs Instore
Size: 40, Color: #01khaki
As to be expected, not seeing and touching before purchase. I bought three pairs of these shorts in different colors for a trip to see my son graduate from his Army National guard AIT. I would rate the overall a five based on fit, quality, and comfort. One thing that I have to mark down, is they have elastic waist bands as described! In the description pic's, they are shown with nice long tie strings. The reality of what I received is the stings are too short to tie. They were almost the same circumference as the waist band, so only able to tie in a small knot, rather than a bow. no Biggy, until it's time for the restroom. Hopefully it's self explanitory....fumbling around with a knot! waist fits as stated to my size, but add weight of wallet and cell phone, and after a few steps, they begin to slide down. Tie string a must. I will see about finding something longer, as I do like them overall!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 7, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Great fabric and quality
These shorts were a gift for my boyfriend who loved how comfortable they were!!! They washed very well bought them to match an army t shirt and they both matched perfectly!!! Size was perfect would definitely recommend these for the man in your life!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 26, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Amazon not delivering after 2 days past delivery date
Size: 36, Color: Camo
These shorts are awesome some of my favorite but Amazon has delayed the out for delivery 2 days in a row now from the original 2 days was supposed to be delivered
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2026
★★★★★ 3
I love them but pockets tear easily
Size: 34, Color: #01black
I love them. They look nice and they are comfortable. I bought a total of three and they're all I wear in the summer.
Unfortunately the strap pockets wear out easily. On my left pocket I store a ridge wallet and my keys. For two of my most worn pair, the strap tore up to where it no longer holds the pocket closed properly. On one of those in the same pocket, a hole ended up torn in the corner. The third one I had to throw out after it shrunk after being washed improperly (can't wash them like I did my previous shorts which I washed the same way as the rest of my clothes).
I think I'll continue to wear them, maybe even buy one more, until I find something better.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 31, 2023