Film Studies & Movie Analysis Elective Full Year Curriculum for High School | SAVE 40%
SKU: 52478676720

Film Studies & Movie Analysis Elective Full Year Curriculum for High School | SAVE 40%

Sale price$140.40 Regular price$156.00
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 7 - Jul 12

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Film Studies & Movie Analysis Elective Full Year Curriculum for High School | SAVE 40%This Film Studies & Movie Analysis Elective Full Year Curriculum is a complete, standards aligned film analysis for entry level high school classes (and mixed readiness groups). This curriculum prioritizes clear scaffolds, broad appeal, and school friendly films that are easy to stream and find. Planning & pacing for each quarter and unit (day by day breakdowns that align with movie guides and extension activities) Easy access to films (with

This Film Studies & Movie Analysis Elective Full Year Curriculum is a complete, standards-aligned film-analysis for entry-level high school classes (and mixed-readiness groups). This curriculum prioritizes clear scaffolds, broad appeal, and school-friendly films that are easy to stream and find. Planning & pacing for each quarter and unit (day-by-day breakdowns that align with movie guides and extension activities)

Easy access to films (with subtitles):

Core titles in this curriculum are available on the three major platforms most classrooms already use: Disney+, Netflix, and Amazon Prime Video. Subtitles/closed captions are excellent on all three services, supporting multilingual learners and accessibility. (See Film Availability reminder for more below) s of 2025, every featured film is streaming on one or more of these platforms; however, catalogs change, so teachers should verify availability before the lesson day and have a backup plan if a title rotates.)

Will this meet my needs?

Check out the full description below and if that isn’t enough get a 100% free course preview here!

What's Included?

  • Everything!
  • Over 800 pages of planning & pacing guides for each quarter
  • Weekly lesson plans that align with movie guides and extension activities
  • so much more below!

Full-Year Only Master Files (Included in the Bonus File)

  • Year-at-a-Glance pacing guide + CCSS Alignment Matrix for all eight units
  • Full-year Educator Planning Guide (rubrics, schedules, differentiation tips)
  • Full-year Student Syllabus
  • Full Year Movie Streaming spreadsheet
  • Parent Guide & editable permission slips

Full Year Outline:
Unit 1 — Dystopia & Environment + Loglines (Extension)

  • WALL·E (G – 2008) — Visual storytelling of dystopia; environmental motifs; how convenience and tech design shape human agency. Students analyze symbols (trash, greenery, the “plant”), cause and effect chains, and tone without heavy dialogue.
  • The Social Dilemma (PG-13 – 2020) — Design ethics and persuasive algorithms; attention economies; personal tech habits. Students test a 48-hour design/policy tweak and reflect on outcomes with evidence.
  • Before the Flood (PG – 2016) — Global climate drivers (energy, land use/deforestation, food systems) and policy levers. Students map a four-step cause and effect pathway and compare emphasis with other films.
  • David Attenborough: A Life on Our Planet (PG – 2020) — Witness narrative + solutions (rewilding, renewables, sustainable practices); students draft a simple systems map connecting tech choices to environmental impacts.

Unit 2 — The Underdog

  • Rudy (PG – 1993) — Grit, gatekeeping, and community support; students evaluate how constraints and allies shape an underdog’s path.
  • Greater (PG – 2016) — Work ethic vs. talent; mindset under loss and doubt; students trace decisions to outcomes with scene evidence.
  • Edward Scissorhands (PG-13 – 1990) — Identity, otherness, and belonging; reading tone, symbolism, and satire as they relate to “underdog” status.
  • The Karate Kid (PG – 1984) — Mentorship, discipline, and ethical competition; students analyze how training sequences develop character theme.
  • The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind (PG – 2019) — Ingenuity, resource scarcity, and community problem-solving; students connect obstacles → strategy → impact.

Unit 3 — Blockbusters (Oldies) + Three Acts & Plot Points (Extension)

  • Toy Story (G – 1995) — Jealousy, identity, and teamwork. Students track how rivalry becomes partnership and map act turns across the toy-room, gas station, and Sid’s house set pieces.
  • The Princess Bride (PG – 1987) — Genre satire and clear archetypes. Students examine how wit, duel scenes, and constant reversals reveal character goals and theme.
  • Jurassic Park (PG-13 – 1993) — Technology, control, and chaos. Students evaluate how suspense and spectacle support theme and broad four-quadrant appeal.
  • Aladdin (G – 1992) — Agency, honesty, and power. Students analyze how musical numbers deliver exposition, advance character arcs, and drive the major plot points.
  • Home Alone (PG – 1990) — Initiative and problem-solving. Students study comedic escalation, planning sequences, and payoff timing in the third act.

Unit 4 — Blockbusters (Modern) + Three Acts & Plot Points (Extension)

  • National Treasure (PG – 2004) — Research puzzles and civic myth. Students analyze heist beats, clue chains, and the ethics behind mission choices.
  • Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (PG – 2023) — Identity, belonging, and the tension between fate and choice. Students explore “canon events,” visual storytelling, and an intentional cliffhanger structure.
  • Avatar (PG-13 – 2009) — Colonialism, empathy, and ecological ethics. Students trace hero’s-journey beats and study world-building as the audience hook.
  • Black Panther (PG-13 – 2018) — Leadership, legacy, and reform. Students analyze the antagonist’s argument, compare leadership styles, and consider how culture and production design sharpen theme.

Unit 5 — War Movies + Cinematography (Extension)

  • 1917 (R – 2019) — A survival mission told with an immersive “one-shot” style. Students examine how camera movement, sound, and production design create urgency; they discuss leadership under pressure and the accuracy of trench warfare.
  • Midway (PG-13 – 2019) — Intelligence, air–sea strategy, and decision-making. Students analyze codebreaking (Rochefort), preparedness debates, and how point-of-view edits shape our understanding of risk and outcome.
  • Unbroken (PG-13 – 2014) — Communication, resilience, and ethics under duress. Students track choices that keep people alive, evaluate leadership and peer influence, and interpret language that signals power and intimidation.
  • The Six Triple Eight (PG-13 – 2024) — Leadership, logistics, and morale. Students study how indexing systems and workflow solve the WWII mail backlog; they analyze scenes of racism/sexism, evidence-based advocacy, and figurative lines that reveal purpose and grief.

Unit 6 — Historical Biographies + Cinematography (Extension)

  • Hamilton (PG-13 – 2020) — Rhetoric, rivalry, and the power of writing. Students compare Burr and Hamilton, unpack cabinet debates, and connect mantras and staging to character development; they reference primary documents.
  • Hidden Figures (PG – 2016) — Access, recognition, and technical literacy. Students map obstacles to strategies and outcomes for Johnson, Vaughan, and Jackson; they argue how data and advocacy change policy.
  • Remember the Titans (PG – 2000) — Coaching styles, culture change, and team unity. Students compare Boone and Yoast, analyze symbolism and music, and extract practical lessons for breaking barriers in schools and communities.
  • McFarland, USA (PG – 2015) — Adaptation, community, and purpose. Students evaluate how a coach changes course, why success matters to this team, and what strong community support looks like.
  • Queen of Katwe (PG – 2016) — Mentorship, agency, and opportunity. Students debate competing adult perspectives, connect chess concepts to life choices, and analyze how travel and exposure reshape goals.

Unit 7 — Literary Classics + Theme (Extension)

  • Holes (PG – 2003) — Institutions and consequences at Camp Green Lake, the gap between “builds character” and practice, names and labels as social armor, justice and redemption in the Sam–Kate thread, symbolism that carries meaning (onions, rain), and friendship expressed through action.
  • Treasure Island (PG – 1950) — Law, status, and early judgment; suspense craft (the “black spot”); leadership and rumor in the run-up to mutiny; Long John Silver’s persuasive rhetoric; risk, strategy, and moral responsibility.
  • Of Mice and Men (PG-13 – 1992) — Friendship and dependence, power and prejudice on the ranch, foreshadowing that builds dread, blame and mercy after tragedy, and the ethics behind George’s final choice.
  • A Christmas Carol (PG – 2009) — Money, empathy, and social responsibility; competing philosophies of Christmas; lessons from Past/Present/Future; what authentic change looks like and how to “keep Christmas well” beyond a single holiday.

Unit 8 — Shakespeare in Movies + Theme (Extension)

  • 10 Things I Hate About You (PG-13 – 1999) — High-school labels and power, boundaries in authority at school and home, deception and consent in deal-making, what repair requires, and a clear map from The Taming of the Shrew to modern character and theme.
  • West Side Story (PG-13 – 2021) — Neighborhood change, belonging, and policing; vows of loyalty and their cost; choreography and lyrics as arguments; responsibility after the rumble; a closing image about grief and the possibility of change.
  • Hamlet (PG – 1990) — Grief and hesitation, line-level meaning in Shakespearean language, conscience vs. revenge, strategies to expose guilt, Gertrude’s role in the harm that follows, and character contrasts with Laertes.
  • The Lion King (G – 1994) — Competing leadership philosophies, the “Circle of Life” as an ethical frame, guilt and avoidance in a coming-of-age arc, and whether “Hakuna Matata” helps or hinders growth.
  • Macbeth (R – 2015) — Prophecy and ambition, persuasion between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, guilt in image and language, equivocation and false security, and how illegitimate power corrodes people and the state.

Extension strands that spiral across the year and include student presentations:

  • Loglines & Student Presentations — Students learn to compress a full story into a crisp 1–2 sentence pitch that names the protagonist, antagonist, setting, rising action, problem, and resolution. They reverse-engineer real examples (e.g., Jurassic Park, Home Alone), compare strong vs. weak versions (fixing missing elements in an Aladdin logline), and build reusable templates.
  • Three Acts & Plot Points & Student Presentations — Students diagram classic 3-Act structure (Hook, Plot Point 1, Midpoint, Plot Point 2/Epiphany, Climax, Aftermath), locate those beats in specific scenes, and use the model to compare “Oldies” and “Modern” blockbusters in short presentations and comparative writing.
  • Cinematography & Student Presentations — Students master six core elements—exposure, mise en scène, camera movement, camera angles, shot size, and color/lighting. In small teams they research sub-elements (e.g., aperture, rule of thirds, dolly vs. zoom, Dutch angle, ECU, key light), present with scene stills or sketches, and then apply the vocabulary to annotated moments from each week’s film. They close with a short write-up that explains how specific visual choices shape emotion, theme, and viewer attention.
  • Theme & Student Presentations — Students move beyond topic lists to write precise, declarative theme statements supported by scenes, symbols, and dialogue. They sort major vs. minor themes, refine word choice for nuance, and present a short “Name-that-Theme” talk where peers infer the film from evidence. The strand reinforces clear claims, succinct explanation, and on-the-spot discussion grounded in film details.

Assessments for each unit:

Two Comparative Analyses and here is a breakdown of all Summative Assessments:

  • Unit 1 - Dystopia & Environment | Summative Preview: Students synthesize design choices and environmental drivers from the unit’s films, then present a short, evidence-based proposal that connects human agency, everyday habits, and near-future outcomes (with a simple systems view).
  • Unit 2 - The Underdog | Summative Preview: Students define and defend what makes an underdog and a hero, then connect film ideas to real life through a brief community interview and reflection on obstacles, support, and impact.
  • Unit 3 — Blockbusters (Oldies) + Three Acts & Plot Points | Summative Preview: Students evaluate how heroes and villains read across generations, argue which are most relatable today, and support a ranked list; or conduct a structured interview with an older adult and synthesize insights about how audience relatability shifts over time.
  • Unit 4 — Blockbusters (Modern) + Three Acts & Plot Points | Summative Preview: Students design a concise “global appeal” organizer that identifies elements modern blockbusters need for U.S. and international audiences, then chart several films against it with brief justifications
  • Unit 5 — War Movies + Cinematography | Summative Preview: Students define four war-film categories (e.g., glorify/critique × realistic/unrealistic), place unit films on the matrix with scene-based evidence, and argue both the industry value of each category and which approach they find most effective.
  • Unit 6 — Historical Biographies + Cinematography | Summative Preview: Students build a chronological timeline of key events or lessons across the unit’s films, each with a concise explanation of significance, and briefly present or discuss choices with a partner.
  • Unit 7 — Literary Classics + Theme | Summative Preview: Students research multiple leadership styles and evaluate one character per film, matching styles to actions and outcomes with specific scene evidence.
  • Unit 8 — Shakespeare in Movies + Theme | Summative Preview: Students either map minor themes across the unit and write a short comparative analysis, or creatively translate an iconic moment for a target audience with a rationale; an optional intergenerational interview deepens perspective.

Standards alignment (ELA strands)

Every unit targets Common Core Anchor Standards across Reading, Writing, Speaking & Listening, and Language. Strand-by-strand coverage (R.1–R.9, W.1–W.9, SL.1–SL.3, L.4–L.5) with explicit standards called out on each Movie Guide and assessment.

Digital or Print—your choice

  • Digital workflow: Turn on Drive › Settings › “Convert uploads to Google Docs editor format,” then drag in the folder. Docs/Slides are ready for Classroom.
  • Print workflow: DOCX and PPTX files are classroom-ready; print slide decks via File → Print → Handouts → 2 per page.

Film Availability Reminder:

As of 2025, every featured film is streaming on one or more of these platforms; however, catalogs change, so teachers should verify availability before the lesson day and have a backup plan if a title rotates. Movie titles were selected that have a high chance of remaining on these platforms unlike some movies that are only available for a limited time. We include a simple spreadsheet that shows which of the 3 platforms (Disney+ / Netflix / Amazon Prime Video) every movie is currently (2025) streaming on.

Does K12MovieGuides offer two full Film Elective Curriculum Options?

Yes! Read below to find out which one is best for your needs?

Film Studies & Movie Analysis: a plug-and-play film curriculum that every class can access?

  • This is a lighter, more accessible companion to our original program—built for introductory learners and mixed-readiness classes. It uses mainstream, easy-to-stream films available on the big three platforms (Disney+ / Netflix / Amazon Prime Video) with strong subtitles for accessibility.
  • Audience: Grades 9–12 general ELA, newcomers, co-taught classes.
  • Content: School-friendly slate (mostly G–PG-13), with only two R-rated titles
  • Scope: 36 movie guides, one simple schedule (no alternates to juggle), streamlined comparative tasks.
  • Standards: Hits core CCSS strands while keeping cognitive load manageable.

Film as Literature & Cinematic Arts: a deep-dive, university-prep experience with canonical titles.

  • This is designed for college-level or highly skilled high school students who thrive on challenging texts and seminar-style analysis. It features more mature, gold-standard films widely recognized for film-study rigor.
  • Audience: Honors, AP bridge, dual-enrollment, advanced electives.
  • Content: Heavier themes and academic film language; titles chosen for canonical significance and depth.
  • Scope: 45 movie guides (vs. 36 in the other edition), with alternate schedules and assessments to support varied pacing and deeper comparative work.
  • Outcomes: Extended research, richer theory/application, and sustained argumentative writing—ideal for students aiming at college-level analysis.

How can I contact K12MovieGuides?

Feel free to email us anytime at [email protected]

Terms & Conditions of Use | Copyright | DMCA

You can:

Use this product for your own personal classroom forever

Ask your school or district to purchase this curriculum for you (or ask about school site and district wide licensing)

You cannot:

Upload this product anywhere that allows unsecured access to where other teachers use it freely

Send this product to other people including emailing, printing copies, or otherwise sharing digitally

Use this product for your personal commercial use

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Do I have to use all of the films included in each unit?

A: No, although it is recommended. When another film not included is more desirable for your students, it should be noted that teachers may need to prepare movie viewing questions and adjust any activities or assessments to reflect the content of the substituted film.

Q: Can Film Studies & Movie Analysis Curriculum be substituted to fulfill high school graduation requirements for an English Language Arts course?

A: Film Studies & Movie Analysis Curriculum was written with the purpose of supporting elective or enrichment selections at the high school level. Therefore, not all Common Core English Language Arts standards are explicitly introduced and spiraled as would be expected with a more traditional English course. However, K12Movieguides.com recommends working with your school or district if there is interest in using Film Studies & Movie Analysis Curriculum as a resource to supplement a core course. A Standards Alignment Guide has been provided in the “Get Started” materials for the entire year course for your reference and use.

Q: Can Film Studies & Movie Analysis Curriculum be used at the middle school level?

A: Yes. It is recommended that instructors consult with their site administrator or administrative team to determine the appropriateness of the themes and content included in each unit in relation to a middle school-age audience.

Q: What if my class can’t finish a film before the assessment window?

A: Use the guide’s pause-points to split the film across days and push any end-of-film essays by one class. For comparisons, allow clip-based evidence from previewed scenes only; do not require scenes students haven’t watched.

Q: Can I show clips instead of the full film?

A: Yes—especially for pacing or permissions. Choose clips that align with the existing question timestamps and keep the chronological flow. Document the clip start/stop times on the guide so students can cite accurately.

Q: How do I handle PG-13/R content and permissions?

A: Follow site policy. Provide a one-paragraph alternate task (same skills: theme/argument/craft) drawn from the same film’s trailer, stills, and script excerpts or from a school-approved alternate title for which you will need to create your own movie guide questions and alter the provided assessments.

Q: How do I support English Learners without diluting rigor?

A: Keep captions on; pre-teach 4–6 words; offer sentence starters (“One film-craft choice that strengthens the theme is…”) and allow oral responses recorded on a device for select prompts. Grade with the same rubric.

Q: What if different classes are using different streaming versions (ads, runtimes)?

A: Instruct students to cite scene description + approximate time (e.g., “Rumble under the highway, ~1:30”) so evidence stays verifiable even if timestamps drift.

Q: Can I swap film order inside a unit?

A: You can, but keep each unit’s Comparative Analysis pairings intact (Weeks 1–2 together; Weeks 3–4 together; Week 5 feeds the Summative). If you reorder, update pacing notes and any lead-in vocabulary.

Q: How should students use AI tools (if allowed by school policy)?

A: Permit AI for brainstorming or clarifying vocabulary only; prohibit AI-written evidence/analysis. Require in-class notes with timestamps to demonstrate original viewing-based thinking.

Q: How do I adapt for students with sensory sensitivities?

A: Offer volume-reduced seating, noise-reducing headphones (if allowed), or a transcript + stills alternative for intense scenes; grade the same skills with equivalent prompts.

Terms and Conditions © 2022 K12MovieGuides.com. All rights reserved. Purchase of this product allows the purchaser the right to reproduce the pages (digitally or in print) in limited quantities for the purchaser’s classroom only. Duplication or distribution for/to another individual, school, school district, private school, or any other business or education agency, or for commercial purposes, is strictly forbidden without written permission from the publisher, K12MovieGuides.com. Copying any part of this product and placing it on the Internet in any form (even a personal/classroom website) is strictly forbidden and is a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). By posting this product freely on the internet, anyone can copy or download it and use it for free. Should a violation occur, the publisher will seek to enforce all rights available to it under the DMCA or other federal and state copyright laws.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 52478676720

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 2414 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jeff Gomske
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Astonishing, Fun, Entertaining, Fantastic
Format: Kindle
I consider The Martian my favorite fictional novel of the last 15-20 years. The movie was incredible in that they actually followed the book closer than 99% of other films based on books. It remains my favorite movie of the last 15 years or so as well. I don't know anyone (personally) that loves either of them as much as I do. With that said, I was REALLY looking forward to Artemis. It was good...but, it was certainly not in the same caliber as The Martian was (at least not for me). I enjoyed it a lot, however and appreciated how author Andy Weir chose to go in a completely different direction and not just rehash another similar story, which I am certain would have been great as well. As a result, I was cautious regarding Project Hail Mary. It sounded a little too close to The Martian, but yet, also different in that the circumstances simply could not be more opposite and the stakes so much higher. I'm trying to figure out the best way to summarize without giving too much away from this utterly compelling novel. As I read several reviews, I noticed a recurring theme: SCIENCE. Lots and LOTS of science. Holy cow, they were right. Many years ago I read Apollo 13 and Jim Lovell and his co-writer, try as they might, simply could not dumb down Orbital Mechanics anywhere near enough for me to have even a minor clue as to what they were attempting to say...I just skipped 90% of it and hoped that the sentences written afterwards, would help to make sense of what I had just skimmed over. I'm a lot of things, but a math wizard is definitely not one of them. Michael Crichton (Jurassic Park) had an amazing talent for dumbing-down the science of what he was trying to explain in ways that genuinely made sense (most of the time). Not everyone has this talent, and I would say Andy Weir falls squarely in between. He's certainly better than Jim Lovell, but not quite as good as Crichton. But then again, outside of a science textbook, I haven't really read anything with quite as MUCH science as Project Hail Mary. So maybe he's just as good, but he just puts more science into his books than Crichton, maybe that's it...? Either way, be prepared for a lot of astonishingly interesting science within the pages of this novel...and I DO mean a LOT. I don't say this to make you wary or steer you away...on the contrary, Andy Weir has a special talent for making hard science truly entertaining. The book opens with an absolutely amazing and frightening premise: an astronaut awakes from an induced coma to find the only other two people on board have died at some point along their journey...but it gets worse. He has no idea who he is, or why he's on the ship, and oh yeah, they look to be a long way from home. A really, REALLY long way from home. In fact, the sun he sees isn't actually OUR sun at all. He's managed to leave our solar system entirely. And he has no idea why. ((Minor Spoilers)) The book goes through some clever flash-backs, which set the stage for why the mission happens, and slowly, carefully explains how they managed to get so far away from earth in such a short amount of time. Basically, earth's sun seems to be dying. At the rate of decay, we have maybe 19 years left before the gradual cooling has catastrophic consequences resulting in the death of billions (best guess). Why the sun is dimming is quite the conundrum in the first place. Turns out it really isn't dying, it's being killed by an outside source...which turns out to be easily the greatest find in history. It's alien life, and they are using the sun for food, essentially. It's alien life, but not intelligent life. But still, wow! ALIENS, right??? After this monumental discovery, and some tremendous research done by the most improbable scientist, the investigation into what is happening and why and what to do about it expands exponentially to other nations in order to pool all the resources possible to hopefully save the sun, and by extension, the human race as well. They learn. A LOT. A plan is put together, and with the help of the newly discovered microscopic alien life, which can also double as a power source (along with a few other nifty surprises), they begin to create one last, Hail Mary that could very well be the last chance we might have to save earth. It's audacious. It's dangerous, and it is absolutely critical that it succeed. As our astronaut's memory slowly unravels, so does his identity: Ryland Grace. He's a teacher on earth. Just a science teacher. Not even a college professor. He's amazingly smart, though. But he's no astronaut...and certainly not one who would volunteer to go on a one-way mission to another solar system to "try" and save humanity. Yet here he is. Alone. light years from earth, trying to solve the biggest riddle in all of human history. Ryland accepts his situation, such as it is, with relative indifference (for the most part). It doesn't matter HOW he got here. He's here now and he may as well use that time to be as productive as possible, right? Along the way, he unravels even more information regarding the microscopic alien life which is slowly dimming our sun during some additional flashbacks. The aliens, dubbed, "Astrophage" are quite the galactic plague as it turns out. Stars all over the galaxy are also losing their light, all due to the little buggers. All that is, except one particular star named, Tau Ceti. Now why would that one star be unaffected by Astrophage, when every single star around it has been affected to some degree. The plan is to go there and figure it out and send the information back, hopefully in time to save the sun before the damage to earth is beyond repair. There is an incredible amount of stuff going on. The story switches from Tau Ceti to flashbacks of how the whole mission was planned and implemented (which is VERY entertaining, especially Director Stratt, who may actually be my favorite character in the entire novel). Weir is becoming quite adept at building tension, and abruptly switching the story from Tau Ceti back to earth and building more of the backstory then switching back to Tau Ceti. Keeping it all in check and most importantly, interesting all while mixing in a healthy dose of science, which I am to understand is pretty much all genuine, is quite the juggling act. I have long known science can be astronomically entertaining (see what I did there?) when done right...but unfortunately very few people in a position to teach science actually know the best way to create that interest in others. I can say without reservation, Andy Weir definitely knows how to do it...at least in written form. There is so much I want to say more regarding this truly phenomenal story, but I simply cannot without ruining a lot of the fun and surprises revealed along the way...and it is killing me to keep it locked in. Though I labeled a spoiler warning earlier, I don't think it gave away any more than what the author himself has revealed in interviews he has done regarding the book, and what you can glean from reading the summary here and just a couple other reviews. Tying all of that science together is truly astonishing to me. The creativity to put it into a novel that is remarkably exciting to read is nothing more than incredible talent. Kudo's to Andy Weir for not just hitting a home run, Project Hail Mary is a Grand Slam all the way. I truly did not want this story to end. By the way, I enjoyed the ending quite a bit. I don't know if everyone will. But it was fine for me. I think the ending screams "sequel" at some point too. A lot was left open-ended (IMO) and I wouldn't mind reading a follow-up to this. It doesn't HAVE to happen, but there are a lot of ways where the story could go if Andy chose to do it. Just sayin'. Just run out and buy this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2021
M
Verified Purchase
Mahlon Everhart
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Wonderful
Format: Kindle
The amount of detail in this book is so interesting and the specifics of so much theoretical ideas revolving around true ideas makes it so fun to read. The writer does a great job and describing every situation enough where you get the point but not too much to try to bore you . The book is very easy to follow, keeps you on your toes, was pretty funny to me, and truthfully just a great book for anyone!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
John Haldane
Boise, US
★★★★★ 4
Read it in 2 days
Format: Paperback
This is science based science fiction. How refreshing to read science without turning the story into horror. Without a plethora of characters, it is easy to remember who is who. The story moves along well enough that I wanted to keep going. It us a p age turner in many respects. All this said, there were too many crises suddenly resolved like some Star Trek episode from 1966. It reached the point where I said to myself, "OK, this doesn't matter. Move along, nothing to see here." There was good humor, some surprising twists, and enough involvement with characters that I didn't want to put it down. As science fiction goes, it was good like pulp stories go. It wasn't like Ursula LeGuin or Robert Heinlein but I would probably pick up the next book he writes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
H
Verified Purchase
Hanay21
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
A book worth rereading
Format: Hardcover
This was a book club pick. Honestly, I wouldn't have chosen to read this myself, but I'm glad that I did. I would have missed out on an incredible story. I've been reading a lot of thriller and fantasy books lately, that I forgot how much I enjoy sci-fi. This brought it back for me. There's a lot of science-heavy discussions in the book and I loved it! When I got to a subject or term I didn't know, I would go online and learn more about it. I feel that Grace is a dork like me because he wouldn't curse. He had little anecdotes he uses in place of swearing. Something I definitely do myself! A lot of the book is the MMC talking to himself. Surprisingly, it worked. There's so much humor that it kept the story going. There was not a lull. Usually I dislike info-dumping as an introduction to get all the background story told, but I didn't mind it at all. Maybe I'm being biased because I love science talk. **SPOILERS AHEAD** What makes the whole plot engaging is the fact that the plot doesn't seem too fantastical. It's something that could happen. There's a lot of ethics and morals involved in determining what should be done. I would hate to be in a position where I have to chose what's best for everyone. That's why Stratt is a necessary character. I hated some of her decisions and how she operated, but you need someone who's focused on the general welfare of humanity. I would be too focused on myself, my family, etc. As much as it hurts to admit, I'm selfish (and a coward) like Grace. I wouldn't want to die. But was it right for Stratt to force him on the mission? This could also be taken religiously. If God has a plan and things happen for a reason, is it our right to deter what's going to happen? God wiped out the world many times because of humanity's sins, what if this was God's doing? So many questions and debates on right vs wrong, ethics vs morals, and religion vs humanity made for a incredible book club discussion. I love how this book ended. I wish I could continue reading about Rocky and Grace's adventures, it's that fascinating. However, I think Grace staying on Erid was the best outcome. If the roles were reversed, I don't think Rocky would have the same welcome. I feel that those in charge would have dissected and kept Rocky hostage, all in the name of science. Just as the Astrophage were first introduced, the first things the scientists did was poke and probe. Essentially torturing the Astrophage to see what makes them tick. I think Rocky would have the same fate. Oh, and my favorite part is the relationship between Rocky and Grace. I cried so many times when I was reading. Scared that something bad was going to happen to either of them. Especially in the scene where Rocky busted out of his tunnel to save Grace. I got upset and told the book that 'if Rocky dies, I swear, this is the worst book ever!' And the scene where Rocky learns about radiation poisoning. How he slowly becomes aware of what happened to his crew, his friends. I was a mess. This book is definitely one that I could go back and reread. I did watch the movie afterwards. There's a lot of differences to adapt the story to screen, but it was okay. They got the humor down pat, but I didn't get the direness of the whole situation nor the special bond that both MCs had.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Kindle Customer
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent story
Format: Kindle
This book is worth your time. It is a great introduction to a variety of scientific disciplines without insulting the reader. It also respects and understands humanity, engineering, history and political science. Then it lays that foundation to tell the story of a unique friendship of two beings with mutual goals who have to communicate and problem solve together. Along the way, you can really contrast how Grace and Rocky do it, vice the Hail Mary team did it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2026

recommand products